The yidish have a word “chutzpah” that means a few different things depending on the context, but it can mean brazenness, gall, shameless audacity. In spanish, you would say someone has “cajones” instead of “chutzpah”. I mention chutzpah in terms of the presidential election and John Kerry and this Vietnam service thing.
At MSNBC today, Kerry takes on Bush with some of the most incredible statements, in particular:
“..John Kerry accused President Bush on Saturday of using surrogates to attack his military service in Vietnam and his subsequent activism against that war” Excuse me, didn’t Kerry use Terry MacAuliffe, Roger Moore and the liberal media to attack Bush for being “AWOL” and a “deserter”?? Kerry also says, “..it has been hard to believe that you would choose to reopen these wounds for your personal political gain. But, that is what you have chosen to do.” What?!?! Kerry and the democrats have been raising the issue, not Bush. This is “chutzpah”.
Later in the article, it notes that Kerry made some of these attacks with ex-Georgia senator Max Cleland at his side. Cleland lost both legs and and arm in Vietnam. He also lost his senate seat in 2002 to a republican. An urban myth amongst democrats is that the republicans attacked Clelands patriotism. Actually, republicans attacked his voting record, which looked a lot like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry’s voting records. That’s not the way to run for state wide office in the south. Cleland took a shot at the republican who beat him in 2002, Saxby Chambliss, making note that Chambliss got a medical excuse from Vietnam service.
It’s obvious Kerry’s strategy is to deflect questions about his liberal voting record and his anti-war Jane-Fonda-loving-days by acting all offended, mentioning his Vietnam service and having Cleland appear with him as many times as possible. If anything the democrats made an error bringing this up in February instead of October. I think the public is tiring of this debate. But Kerry won’t let it die.