On September 25th, I wrote the following about the democrats running for president [link]:
I don’t know if these guys were paying attention in high school civics class, but presidents don’t repeal diddly squat. Dean thinks he can just wave his arms and, “Poof!”, the tax cut is repealed. The congress, in particular the House of Representatives and the Senate, would have to pass a bill that would “repeal” the tax cut and then President Dean would sign the tax bill. No bill from Congress, no repeal. Considering the house and senate will most likely still be in Republican hands in 2005, the chances that they would vote to “repeal” the tax cuts for President Dean or Kerry are slim and none.
Well, today, Washington Post columnist David Broder writes in his column:
Some would go much further and eliminate all the reductions Bush has pushed through Congress in the past three years. Former Vermont governor Howard Dean and Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri take that position, while retired Gen. Wesley Clark, and Sens. John Edwards of North Carolina, John Kerry of Massachusetts and Joe Lieberman of Connecticut would let middle-class families keep their tax cuts and limit the rollbacks to high-income households…Yet none of the candidates — or their policy advisers — is asked the obvious question: What if the House of Representatives, which must originate revenue bills, remains under Republican control in 2005? ….That is the likelihood, after all.
I wonder if Broder reads DynamoBuzz?? If so, he owes me at least an acknowledgement for using my ideas.