My Two Cents on the Debate
Thursday, September 30th, 2004- Kerry and Bush stayed on message. No big mistakes, and I don’t see any shocking sound bites coming out of this.
- I still don’t know what Kerry would do differently in Iraq other than “bring in more allies” which as we all know ain’t gonna happen. I wish Bush had mentioned our allies more, and not just in Iraq but also the work done in Pakistan and the work the Europeans have done in arresting Al Qaeda.
- Kerry seems convinced that if we had carried Osama’s body out of Tora Bora back in December 2001 the war on terror would be over. Most people don’t believe that, and Bush should have pointed out that Kerry is wrong on this.
- Bush looked a bit bored by the whole thing. An hour and a half is too long.
- Kerry knew this could have been his swan song if he blew it, so he was more on edge.
- This probably soothed the Kerry supporters, but I doubt if he convinced any Bush voters to switch.
- Kerry was more “inside the beltway” than Bush. I don’t think voters decide based on those kinds of discussions of the issues. I’ve always felt voters make decisions based more on emotions, and I think Bush is better at emotional appeals.
- The two minute limit probably helped Kerry. A ten minute discussion about Kyoto would have doomed him.
So, Kerry did well enough that he’ll live to fight another day. He could have imploded and doomed his campaign a month before the election, but he didn’t. On the DynamoBuzz scale (see below) he gets a Healthy Color rating with maybe a touch of bronze.

