One of the criticisms of the blogosphere is that reaction is instant and usually emotional as compared to the MSM where stories are reviewed by editors and many times rewritten befor publishing. Rather than representing a thoughful evaluation, bloggers represent instant emotional response. Now that the blogosphere was gotten a higher profile, the MSM is starting to act in the same way.
The Dubai-Port story appears to be a good example. The initial response, from bloggers who were aghast that we were “outsourcing port security” to the politicians who raced each other to the nearest microphone and TV camera to the MSM who fed the frenzy.
As more news has come out during the week, the Dubai-port story appears to be not a big deal, yet too many politicians have already staked out extreme positions that it will be hard to move the deal forward. NJ politicians, Jon Corzine and Bob Menendez, are already too far out on the limb to reverse course while still saving face. And democrats are cynically taping into gut reaction bigotry to bash the president.
Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit was against it at first, but
now supports the deal. John Miller and other posters at National Review credit the blogosphere for pointing out that Dubai is no Iran. Christopher Dickey, no Bush supporter, has actually been to Dubai and the UAE and says the opoposition is xenophobia and will hurt US outreach efforts in the Arab world.
Rush Limbaugh has been a voice of cuation and analysis in this entire “Arabs running the ports” debate. On the first day the story broke, he came out in favor of the deal. He also noted that the story has actually been out there for awhile and only recently got elevated in the media, leading him to believe this is just another story in a long running MSM effort to attack the administration (last week, Cheney hunting, this week Dubai, next week something else).
Star-Ledger columnist Tom Moran gives a thoughtful defense of the deal in Minus facts, foes of deal miss boat on vital ally. John Farmer, who can find a Bush bashing opportunity in every story says in Bush gets port deal right, politics wrong that a closer look at the deal says that Bush is right.
Tom Kean Sr. has argued that while the deal makes sense on paper, politically it won’t fly because the the demagogues are against it. He blames all the problems on Bush even though he thinks the deal is probably not a security threat [link]. Next thing you know, Kean will say it’s OK for women to wear short skirts but it’s a bad idea because someone will rape them. Kean also notes that we should be wary of the UAE because two of the 9-11 hijackers were from the country. Some of the hi-jackers had NJ drivers licenses, so perhaps Kean wants to ostracize the Garden State??
The biggest problem is the timing. I do believe that Americans are getting a bit tired of seeing cartoon riots, suicide bombings and beheadings while being lectured to by Iranian lunatics and Palestinian terrorists. It may take some time and some concessions by Dubai and the US, but the deal will go forward in some form in the next few months.